Six Models, Six Winners: Split Variance in Clinical Machine Learning Comparisons
编号:132 访问权限:仅限参会人 更新:2026-11-10 16:51:50 浏览:13次 Online

报告开始:2026年11月21日 16:00(Asia/Kolkata)

报告时间:15min

所在会场:[S5] Data Science and Intelligent Analytics [S5-2] Data Science and Intelligent Analytics

演示文件

提示:该报告下的文件权限为仅限参会人,您尚未登录,暂时无法查看。

摘要
Clinical machine learning papers routinely compare several models on one train/test split and report the winner. We measured what that winner is worth. On six public clinical datasets we ran six standard classifiers over 200 stratified splits each. On the Cleveland heart disease data all six models won at least one split, and the best-on-average model won only 34% of them. One model's AUROC ranged from 0.832 to 0.961 across splits while the six models' average AUROCs spanned 0.021, so the noise was six times the signal. From the same data one split supports the claim that random forest beats logistic regression by 0.045 and another supports the reverse by 0.052. The chance that one split reverses the published order follows Φ(−z), with z the gap divided by the standard deviation of the paired difference; observed and predicted rates agreed to within 0.04 on four of five non-degenerate datasets. Drawing ten splits and keeping the best gained a median 0.040 AUROC on heart disease, nearly twenty times the real gap between the top two models. Not every benchmark behaves this way: on Framingham, where logistic regression leads by 0.031, it won 99% of splits. Five-fold cross-validation cut the estimator's standard deviation to a median 23% of a single split and repeated five-fold to 14%, lifting winner agreement on heart disease from 0.53 to 0.83. The standardised gap costs nothing to compute, and reporting it would tell a reader whether the ranking means anything.
 
关键词
model comparison, benchmarking, cross-validation, clinical prediction, evaluation variance, reproducibility, AUROC, machine learning in medicine,model comparison,benchmarking,Cross validation,clinical prediction,evaluation variance,AUROC,machine learning,
报告人
Karan Tejpal
Analytics Engineer Treasure AI

稿件作者
Karan Tejpal Treasure AI
Simar Preet Singh Bennet University
发表评论
验证码 看不清楚,更换一张
全部评论
重要日期
  • 会议日期

    11月20日

    2026

    至

    11月22日

    2026

  • 10月31日 2026

    初稿截稿日期

  • 11月07日 2026

    提前注册日期

  • 11月22日 2026

    注册截止日期

主办单位
United Societies of Science
承办单位
Pondicherry University
协办单位
IEEE Section
IEEE Madras Section
移动端
在手机上打开
小程序
打开微信小程序
客服
扫码或点此咨询